Legal Opinion

Waters v. City of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 7, 1968No. 6 Div. 490PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARWOOD, Justice.

The appellants here were the complainants below in a declaratory proceedings in equity. They sought to have declared invalid Ordinance 391 G which undertook to amend the Zoning District Map of the City of Birmingham as same appears in the General Code of the City of Birmingham of 1944, as amended.

The respondents were the Methodist Hospital, Inc., a Corporation, and the City of Birmingham.

The land affected and rezoned by Ordinance 391 G was owned by the Methodist Hospital, Inc., a Corporation and consisted of roughly 37 acres. Prior to the enactment of the ordinance this land…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ball v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  2. Leary v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Episcopal Foundation of Jefferson County v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  4. Marshall v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. League of Women Voters v. RenfroSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  2. AMERICAN PETROLEUM EQUIP. AND CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. FancherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  3. Cudd v. City of HomewoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  4. Allen v. AxfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  5. Ex Parte SimpsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API