Legal Opinion

United States v. Mitchell

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 1, 1921No. 9276PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Criminal prosecution by the United States against Charles Mitchell and Jóe O’Donnell. On motion by defendant Mitchell for return of property seized.

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLJNG, District Judge.

[1] The defendant Mitchell was apparently violating the Prohibition L,aw (41 Stat. 305) by selling intoxicating liquor at his place of business, 211 Kearny street, San Francisco. The enforcement officers searched these premises by virtue of a search warrant and found there certain liquor. They also purchased liquor there. Thereupon they applied for a search warrant to search the residence of defendant at 880 Bush street. This is an apartment house, in which defendant occupies with his family apartment No. 4. It does not seem that the officers would have had any…

2Cited by35 opinions

  1. United States v. Savannah Hinton, United States of America v. Susie Powers, Alias Susie PendletonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
  2. United States v. KaplanDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1923
  3. People v. EstradaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. People v. GoveaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Agnello v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API