Legal Opinion

Kolonik v. Hudson Coal Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 3, 1947No. Appeal, 1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Dithrich, J.,

The sole question involved in this appeal from an award of workmen’s compensation is whether the violation of a statute and a positive order of an employer takes an employee out of the course of his employment where there is no causal connection between the violation and the accident.

Notwithstanding the rule in negligence cases — analogous to compensation cases in that both depend upon the happening of an accident — that violation of an act of assembly is not always negligence per se, appellant would have us adopt a much more stringent rule in construing a provision of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shoffler v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Hopwood v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Molek v. W. J. Rainey, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Vince v. Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Robertson v. Rieder & SonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Walker v. Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Moore v. Hunt Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Webber v. Midway BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Tremont Township School District v. Western Anthracite Coal Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API