Legal Opinion

Bateman v. Board of Commissioners of Improvement District No. 1

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 12, 1912PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Monroe Chancery Court; John M. Elliott, Chancellor;

1Opinion of the Court

McCulloch, C. j.

An improvement district has been duly formed in the city of Clarendon, Arkansas, for the purpose of constructing a system of waterworks and sewerage, and appellant, a citizen and owner of real property in said district, instituted this action in the chancery court against the board of improvement to restrain the latter from entering into a contract for the construction of said improvement at a cost in excess of 20 per centum of the value of real property in the district and from issuing bonds in excess of said amount. The chancery court sustained a demurrer to appellant’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  2. Webster v. FergusonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  3. Wilson v. BlanksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dailey v. PughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Bottrell v. HollipeterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  3. Miller v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  4. Searcy Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of SearcySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  5. Metropolitan Water District v. HeilbronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API