Bateman v. Board of Commissioners of Improvement District No. 1
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Monroe Chancery Court; John M. Elliott, Chancellor;
1Opinion of the Court
McCulloch, C. j.
An improvement district has been duly formed in the city of Clarendon, Arkansas, for the purpose of constructing a system of waterworks and sewerage, and appellant, a citizen and owner of real property in said district, instituted this action in the chancery court against the board of improvement to restrain the latter from entering into a contract for the construction of said improvement at a cost in excess of 20 per centum of the value of real property in the district and from issuing bonds in excess of said amount. The chancery court sustained a demurrer to appellant’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
- Webster v. FergusonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Wilson v. BlanksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dailey v. PughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
- Bottrell v. HollipeterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
- Miller v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- Searcy Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of SearcySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- Metropolitan Water District v. HeilbronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.