Miller v. Hamilton
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Arkansas; Jacob Trieber, Judge. Mandamus at law by J. F. Hamilton and others against Max D. Miller and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
CARLAND, Circuit Judge.
Defendants in error, hereafter called plaintiffs, brought this proceeding in mandamus against the plaintiffs in error, hereafter called the defendants, to compel the assessment and levy of certain taxes for the purpose of paying a judgment which the plaintiffs had obtained against the board of improvement of sewer district No. 1, in the city of Marianna, Ark. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, and defendants sued out a writ of error to review that judgment. The judgment was rendered on the pleadings, and we will endeavor to state the facts as they appear…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brooke v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Fitzgerald v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
- Jewell v. City of SuperiorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1904
- Morrilton Waterworks Improvement District v. EarlSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1903
- Lenon v. BrodieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Drainage Dist. No. 7District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1938
- In re RogersDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1924
- Canal Const. Co. v. Federal Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Whitaker & Co. v. GrableCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940