Layton City v. Stevenson
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THORNE, Judge:
¶ 1 Layton City appeals from the district court’s final order dismissing, with prejudice, one count of patronizing a prostitute against Brent Sorenson Stevenson. See generally Utah Code Ann. § 76-10-1303 (LexisNexis 2012). We reverse and remand.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 Defendant was arrested in Layton City and charged in second district court with patronizing a prostitute. On April 14, 2009, Defendant entered into a plea in abeyance agreement with Layton City. Under the terms of the agreement, Defendant pleaded no contest to the patronizing a prostitute charge; in return, Layton…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Archuleta v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. BakerUtah Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. MusselmanUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. AmadorCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Layton City v. StevensonUtah Supreme Court · 2014
- Salt Lake City v. NorthernCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- Layton City v. StevensonUtah Supreme Court · 2014