Legal Opinion

Layton City v. Stevenson

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided March 14, 2013No. 20110840-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THORNE, Judge:

¶ 1 Layton City appeals from the district court’s final order dismissing, with prejudice, one count of patronizing a prostitute against Brent Sorenson Stevenson. See generally Utah Code Ann. § 76-10-1303 (LexisNexis 2012). We reverse and remand.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 Defendant was arrested in Layton City and charged in second district court with patronizing a prostitute. On April 14, 2009, Defendant entered into a plea in abeyance agreement with Layton City. Under the terms of the agreement, Defendant pleaded no contest to the patronizing a prostitute charge; in return, Layton…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Archuleta v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. BakerUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. MusselmanUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. AmadorCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Layton City v. StevensonUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Salt Lake City v. NorthernCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  3. Layton City v. StevensonUtah Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API