Legal Opinion

State v. Amador

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided December 18, 1990No. 900007-CAPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARFF, Judge:

The State of Utah appeals the order entered by the Fifth District Court on December 18,1989 terminating defendant’s probation nunc pro tunc. This termination also served to vacate an order to show cause, erroneously issued September 5, 1989, after defendant’s probation terminated September 1, 1989. We dismiss the appeal.

FACTS

Defendant Martin Ray Amador was placed on supervised probation on March 1, 1988, for a period of eighteen months, after being convicted of the second degree felony of kidnapping and the third degree felony of aggravated assault. On August 16, 1989, an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Madsen v. BorthickUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Ward v. Richfield CityUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Smith v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. MusselmanUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. KelbachUtah Supreme Court · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. YatesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
  2. Luckau v. Board of Review of the Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
  3. Hercules Inc. v. Utah State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
  4. State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
  5. State v. LarsenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API