Legal Opinion

Salt Lake City v. Northern

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided December 27, 2013No. 20120904-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

{1 Defendant Earl Northern appeals his conviction of assault with a domestic violence enhancement, a class A misdemeanor, following the revocation of his plea in abeyance. Northern contends that the district court erred in determining, after an evidentiary hearing, that he committed a new violation of the law that constituted a breach of the requirements of his plea in abeyance agreement. We affirm.

T2 Utah Code section 77-2a-4(1) states,

If, following an evidentiary hearing, the court finds that the defendant has failed to substantially comply with any term or condition of the plea in abeyance…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. RobbinsUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. DavieCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  3. State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  4. Smargon v. Grand Lodge Partners, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  5. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API