Salt Lake City v. Northern
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Per curiam
{1 Defendant Earl Northern appeals his conviction of assault with a domestic violence enhancement, a class A misdemeanor, following the revocation of his plea in abeyance. Northern contends that the district court erred in determining, after an evidentiary hearing, that he committed a new violation of the law that constituted a breach of the requirements of his plea in abeyance agreement. We affirm.
T2 Utah Code section 77-2a-4(1) states,
If, following an evidentiary hearing, the court finds that the defendant has failed to substantially comply with any term or condition of the plea in abeyance…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. RobbinsUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. DavieCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
- State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
- Smargon v. Grand Lodge Partners, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020