Legal Opinion

URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY OF CITY v. Hart

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 2009No. 35435PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Justice.

This is an appeal from a district court’s decision confirming the validity of revenue allocation bonds. The Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Rexburg (the Agency) petitioned the district court for judicial confirmation of the validity of bonds the Agency wishes to issue to Zions Bank Public Finance (Zions) for the purpose of financing construction of the Riverside Park Urban Renewal Project (the Project). Kenneth W. Hart, a citizen of Rexburg, Idaho, challenged the petition on grounds that issuance of the bonds would violate the prohibitions against municipal indebtedness…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Olsen v. J.A. Freeman Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Houghland Farms, Inc. v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Greenough v. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Boise Redevelopment Agency v. Yick Kong Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Johannsen v. UtterbeckIdaho Supreme Court · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Abraham Scraggins, Jr.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Doyle v. The Harris Ranch Community Infrastructure District No. 1Idaho Supreme Court · 2026
  3. Hoffman v. City of BoiseIdaho Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API