Summerfield v. Pringle

DUNLAP, J.,

dissenting. — I conclude, after a careful analysis of the evidence in this case, that it does not justify the verdict in the amount rendered by the jury; that it is so disproportionate to any compensation reasonably warranted by the circumstances and facts as disclosed by the evidence, as to shock the sense of justice and raises a presumption that it is a result of passion and prejudice rather than sober and dispassionate judgment.

While it is probably true that appellant, in her acts and dealings with her son and his wife did not always employ the tact, patience and restraint which…