Legal Opinion

United States v. Trinkle

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 31, 2013No. 12-3106UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

HARRIS L. HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Billy Trinkle filed a motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, claiming that his two prior convictions for criminal threat did not constitute convictions of “crimes of violence” under the career-offender sentencing enhancement of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, § 4B1.1. The court denied the motion but granted his request for a certificate of appealability (COA) on one ground for his claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (requiring COA to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. United States v. Zuniga-SotoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Wetzel-SandersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. MulayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  3. Adkins v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API