Legal Opinion

United States v. Christensen

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 7, 2006No. 05-4115PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

Samuel Neil Christensen pleaded guilty to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). His sentence was enhanced under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), upon a finding by the sentencing judge that his prior arson conviction in Nevada was a “violent felony.” Judgment was entered June 21, 2004. Mr. Christensen did not appeal his conviction. He did, however, file in the United States District Court for the District of Utah on March 31, 2005, a motion for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, contending that his…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. PettifordCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. Chang HongCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  3. Ezell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. Raymond Surratt, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  5. Corey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API