Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Board of Liquidation of City Debt v. Briede

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 7, 1906No. 15,992PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; George Henry Théard, Judge. Application for mandamus by the state, on tbe relation of tbe board of liquidation of tbe city debt, against Otto F. Briede, as city treasurer, to compel respondent to pay over certain funds to relator. From a judgment for relator, respondent appeals..

1Opinion of the CourtBreaux, C. J.

The relator prayed for a mandamus to issue, commanding the treasurer of tbe city of New Orleans to pay to it, or its fiscal agent, the proceeds of tbe 1 per cent. tax.

Judgment was pronounced in its favor, from which respondent and intervener appeal.

Tbe judgment in question directs that tbe tax in question be paid over to the Canal Louisiana Bank & Trust Company, alleged depository of tbe fund.

On appeal, the relator answered and asked that the judgment he amended by directing the respondent treasurer to pay the amount over to it, the relator, and, in the alternative, to the Canal Louisiana…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Teal v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Grider v. TallySupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  3. Capdevielle v. New Orleans & S. F. R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  4. Succession of JanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1891
  5. Swayze v. City of MonroeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. KuderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Hood Motor Company, Inc. v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  3. In Re Courthouse of Okmulgee CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Stuart v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. City of New Orleans v. Board of LiquidationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API