Legal Opinion

People v. Stokes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s contention that his conviction for conspiracy and underlying narcotics-related crimes violated the constitutional protection against double jeopardy. Defendant had previously been convicted on similar charges (see, People v Stokes [No. 124], 198 AD2d 847 [decided herewith]), but the factual allegations underlying the respective indictments concerned separate and distinct transactions (see, People v Vera, 47 NY2d 825; People v Abbamonte, 43 NY2d 74). Moreover, under the circumstances, and particularly in light of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. AntommarchiNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. People v. AbbamonteNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. People v. VeraNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. People v. StokesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. PaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. People v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. People v. StokesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API