Legal Opinion

People v. Paul

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 3, 1995PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed and new trial granted on count nine of the indictment in accordance with the following Memorandum: County Court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress evidence and statements on the ground that the police lacked probable cause to arrest defendant. Responding to a complaint that a young woman had been robbed of a ring as she left a bar, police tracked a set of footprints in fresh snow to an apartment building. They entered the building and observed four black males on the landing, two of whom fit a general description…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. HollmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. People v. RyanNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. People v. LeungNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. People v. TorresNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. RomanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. People v. WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. PaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. People v. ShinebargerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. People v. GardnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API