Legal Opinion
Leinoff v. Louis Milona & Sons, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 11, 1982No. 81 Civ. 1107 (CBM)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
MOTLEY, District Judge.
Nature of the Action
By this action, plaintiff David Leinoff seeks an injunction and damages as a result of alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 3,760,424 by defendant Louis Milona and Sons, Inc. Defendant, in addition to asserting that the Leinoff patent is invalid under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103, also offer as a defense that plaintiff is barred from asserting this cause of action by the doctrine of laches. Jurisdiction of this court is invoked under 35 U.S.C. § 281, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a).
Parties
Plaintiff, David Leinoff…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Anderson's-Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Salvage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sakraida v. Ag Pro, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. United States Plywood CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- David Leinoff v. Louis Milona & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Morgan Adhesives Co. v. Chemtrol Adhesives, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1983
- Leinoff v. Louis Milona & Sons, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- David Leinoff v. Louis Milona & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984