Dulin v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
SOMERVILLE, -J.
The defendant’s motion for the transfer of the case from the law side to the equity side of the docket, was not verified by affidavit as required by the statute, and the demurrer to the motion was properly sustained on that ground. " Code, § 6490; Briggs v. Prowell, 207 Ala. 629, 93 So. 590. And, it should be added, the motion does not allege facts sufficient to justify the removal sought.
Under section 6670 of the Code, to sustain a judgment of the court granting a motion for a new trial after the lapse of more than 30 days from the date of the original judgment, the record…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sweeney v. TritschSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Chamblee v. ColeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
- Ex Parte SchoelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Ex Parte MargartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Johnson v. Johnson's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1866
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mt. Vernon-Woodberry Mills v. Union Springs Guano Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Williams v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Kelley v. ChavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Lokey v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Wiggins v. Tuscaloosa Warehouse Groceries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.