Legal Opinion
Merchandise Reporting Co. v. L. Oransky & Sons
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided July 1, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtKeller, J.
The facts as found by the referee are substantially as follows: David Oransky, an officer of the defendant corporation, the owner of a department store in Des Moines, Iowa, was served with a summons in an action in this court while in the city of New York. The action is for breach of a written contract of employment, pursuant to which plaintiff acted as defendant’s representative in the city of New York. The defendant appeared specially and moved to vacate the service of the summons on the ground that the court has no jurisdiction, its contention being that it has not filed a certificate…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. Curtis Brown Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Hamlin v. G. E. Barrett & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Fleischmann Construction Co. v. Blauner'sAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Halpern v. Pennsylvania Lumber IndustriesNew York Supreme Court · 1930