Legal Opinion
People v. Hockaday
Illinois Supreme Court
Decided December 17, 1982No. 55873PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Simon
The issue here is the sufficiency of an information charging the defendant, William Hockaday, with the offense of forgery by delivery (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 38, par. 17—3(a)(2)). The challenged portion of the information reads:
“BILLY BOB HOCKADAY *** committed the offense of FORGERY, in that the said defendant, with the intent to defraud, knowingly delivered to Debbie Saylor a document apparently capable of defrauding another, in that it purported to have been made by another, Robert Owens and Tom Hanson, a copy of the document is attached and made a part hereof by reference thereto, said…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The People v. MillsIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
- People v. LutzIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- The People v. PatrickIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. BanksIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. DickersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. WissleadIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- People v. ThompsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- People v. HunterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.