Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1984No. 58124PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Simon

This appeal presents two questions for resolution: Must a one-count information captioned “Reckless Homicide” set forth the element of recklessness in the body of the information? If so, must a challenge to an information which does not allege recklessness be sustained pursuant to People v. Lutz (1978), 73 Ill. 2d 204, when raised for the first time in a timely motion in arrest of judgment?

An information filed against the defendant, Robert H. Smith, charged:

“That on the 26th day of July, 1981, in [Ford] County, Robert Smith AKA Snyder committed the offense of Reckless Homicide, in violation…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Illinois v. VitaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. People v. GilmoreIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. PujoueIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  4. People v. LutzIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  5. The PEOPLE v. HeardIllinois Supreme Court · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. People v. EvansIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. ThingvoldIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. NashIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. BaldwinIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. RyanIllinois Supreme Court · 1987

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API