Legal Opinion
Flo-Rob, Inc. v. COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 5, 1984No. 67517PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Carley, Judge.
Appellee-condemnor owns a pipeline which extends across certain property of appellant-condemnee. Corrosion problems and related difficulties arose with regard to the pipeline, and appellee determined that a protective device was necessary. Pursuant to OCGA § 22-2-100 et seq., appellee instituted in rem proceedings to condemn certain land of appellant to be used for the installation of the protective device. Asserting that it had been damaged as a result of the defective pipeline, appellant filed a counterclaim against appellee, alleging nuisance, trespass, negligence, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. DatrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Simon v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Nodvin v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Department of Transportation v. SimonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Fountain v. DeKalb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Albahary v. City of BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Shealy v. UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF ATHENS-CLARKECourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- PRIBEAGU Et Al. v. GWINNETT COUNTYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- Department of Transportation v. Gilbert's Auto Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Corneliu Pribeagu v. Gwinnett County, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016