Department of Transportation v. Gilbert's Auto Service, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
MlKELL, Judge.
In this inverse condemnation action, appellant Department of Transportation of Georgia (“DOT”) appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of Gilbert’s Auto Service, Inc. (“Gilbert’s Auto”). The trial court denied DOT’s motion for directed verdict made at the close of evidence and its motion for judgment n.o.v. In both motions, DOT argued that Gilbert’s Auto’s action was barred by a consent judgment entered in a prior condemnation action. Applying the appropriate standard of review, which provides that we “can only set a verdict aside, on evidentiary grounds, as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. GaultSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
- Cook v. HuffSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Department of Transportation v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Franklin Credit Management Corp. v. FriedenbergCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Bill Ledford Motors, Inc. v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Duke Galish, LLC v. MantonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011