Nodvin v. Georgia Power Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Presiding Judge.
1. Condemnee contends initially that each and every action taken in the special master proceeding is void because Georgia Power Company is not empowered to use that form of condemnation proceeding. He contends that Code § 36-811 (when and how power companies may condemn) authorizes only those procedures of Chapters 36-2 to 36-6, and that Code Ann. § 36-602a (special master as cumulative of other methods) refers only to use by governmental bodies.
The power company and the Attorney General, who appeared as amicus curiae, contend that the 1967 amendment to Code Ann. §…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bowers v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- State Highway Department v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Johnson v. Fulton CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Wiggins v. City of MacOnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Cason v. HarnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
3Cited by25 opinions
- Georgia Transmission Corp. v. WorleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Dorsey v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Lang v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Wrege v. Cobb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Shoemaker v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.