Legal Opinion

Pueblo v. National Indian Gaming Commission

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 17, 2010No. Civil Action 10-00760 (ESH)PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.

Defendant National Indian Gaming Commission (“NIGC”) has moved to transfer venue to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Because this action could have been brought in the Western District of Texas, and because transfer to that jurisdiction is in the public interest, the motion will be granted.

BACKGROUND

In the underlying action, plaintiff Ysleta del Sur Pueblo (“Pueblo”) challenges NIGC’s determination that the Pueblo is not under NIGC jurisdiction for funding and other…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. American Dredging Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Trout Unlimited v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Sheffer v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  2. Spaeth v. Michigan State University College of LawDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  3. Taylor v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  4. The Federal Housing Finance Agency v. First Horizon Home Loan CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. Oceana, Inc. v. PritzkerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API