Legal Opinion
Oceana, Inc. v. Pritzker
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 28, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2013-0770PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Oceana, Inc. brought this action under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706, challenging procedural and substantive aspects of the National Marine Fisheries Service’s at-sea monitoring program in its Northeast Multispecies Fishery. Oceana alleges that the Service’s relatively lax monitoring plan was motivated by cost savings, not conservation, and that, as a result, it violates controlling law, including this Court’s decision in Oceana, Inc. v. Locke, 831 F.Supp.2d 95 (D.D.C.2011). See Compl., ¶ 60.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- William Rodger Starnes v. Honorable Matthew F. McGuire Arthur Everett Small, Jr. v. Honorable George L. Hart, JrCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- American Dredging Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Stewart v. AzarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Conservation Law Foundation v. PritzkerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. RossCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Defenders of Wildlife v. JewellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- M & N Plastics, Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.