Spanner v. United States
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
BREWSTER, District Judge.
This is a petition to enforce a policy of yearly renewable term insurance. The defendant has moved to dismiss the petition on the ground that there was no disagreement between the parties within the meaning of the World War Veterans’ Act, as amended, 38 U.S.C.A. § 421 et seq. Such a disagreement is alleged. The motion, therefore, involves consideration of facts not appearing on the record.
The issue was informally presented without testimony or affidavits. The United States has submitted, with the approval of the plaintiff’s attorney, documents from the case folder,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mara v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- United States v. EarwoodCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1931
- McLaughlin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Hansen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- May v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981