Legal Opinion

Hansen v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 17, 1933No. 4988PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPARKS, Circuit Judge.

An opinion was written by the court, in which the question of jurisdiction was very carefully considered, and we think it would serve no good purpose for us to restate the propositions there decided upon. We therefore incorporate that opinion as a part of our own:

“It is first necessary to determine a question upon which the jurisdiction of this court depends. In other words, it is necessary to determine whether there has been a ‘disagreement as to claim under a contract of insurance between the bureau and any person or persons claiming thereunder for it is well settled…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mara v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
  2. Kelley v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1932
  3. Taylor v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1932
  4. Griffin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
  5. Anderson v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1932

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. BryanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
  2. Eidam v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  3. United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  4. Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
  5. Bigley v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API