Legal Opinion

Douglas v. Frigidaire Sales Corp.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 14, 1934No. 13875PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. W. C. Cothran, Acting Associate Justice.

It appears from the complaint herein that in May, 1928, plaintiff purchased a frigidaire from a so-called “authorized dealer and agent of the defendant” in the City of Florence and was grievously disappointed in her purchase. After much inconvenience, expense, loss of food, etc., she brought suit against the defendant, in September, 1933, for damages in the sum of $1,000.00. Service of the summons and complaint was made upon one, DeLeon Finklea, designated in the proof of service as the agent of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State of South Carolina v. W.T. Rawleigh Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Joseph M. Shealy, Jr. v. Challenger Manufacturing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  2. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. ManionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  3. Bargesser v. Coleman Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  4. Harrell v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  5. McDaniel v. Gulf Oil CorporationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API