Legal Opinion
Voisinet v. Coglianese
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided March 9, 1972No. 8595PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lane, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority of invention of the sole count in issue to Coglianese et al. (Coglianese). Voisinet is involved on an application1 filed August 13, 1962, while Coglianese is involved on an application2 filed March 15,1962, which was a continuation-in-part of an application3 filed April 12, 1961. The board accorded the party Voisinet the date of April 11, 1961, for conception and actual reduction to practice of the invention of the count, but awarded appellees priority 4 on the holding that they were entitled…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hugh S. Knowles v. George C. TibbettsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Kenneth H. White v. Harold H. P. LemmermanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation. Sauquoit Fibers Company v. Leesona Corporation, Kayser-Roth Corporation (In Its Own Name and D/B/A Kayser-Roth Hosiery Companyand Kayser-Roth Hosiery Co., Inc.) v. Leesona Corporation, Leesona Corporation v. The Duplan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Standard Oil Company v. MontedisonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
- Steinberg v. SeitzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- Sauquoit Fibers Co. v. Leesona Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- In re DardickCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.