Legal Opinion

Kasal v. Hlinka

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 31, 1912No. Nos. 17,409—(33)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action in the district court for Le Sueur county to have a certain deed canceled; to have defendants execute to plaintiff a full warranty deed of the premises upon payment of the purchase price by plaintiff and to recover $1,200 damages for retaining- possession of the premises. With the exception of the execution of the contract, the allegations of the complaint were denied in the separate answers of Emily and Joseph Chromy.

Read the full summary

Action in the district court for Le Sueur county to have a certain deed canceled; to have defendants execute to plaintiff a full warranty deed of the premises upon payment of the purchase price by plaintiff and to recover $1,200 damages for retaining- possession of the premises. With the exception of the execution of the contract, the allegations of the complaint were denied in the separate answers of Emily and Joseph Chromy. The ease was tried before Morrison, J., who made findings and as conclusions of law found that plaintiff was not entitled to ¡specific performance of the contract; that…

1Opinion of the CourtPhilip E. Brown, J.

Action to cancel a deed and to enforce specific performance of a contract to convey land. The cause was tried to the court without a jury. On the trial the court dismissed the action as to the defendants Chromy. Thereafter findings were filed directing the dismissal of the action as to the defendant Annie Hlinka on the merits, and determining that the plaintiff was not entitled to the specific performance of the contract alleged in the complaint, but should recover from the defendant Thomas Hlinka the sum of $100, without -interest and without costs or disbursements; and it was ordered that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Townshend v. GoodfellowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. Schwab v. BaremoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. Stearns v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  4. Smith v. LytleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
  5. Stromme v. RieckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Raymond v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. Shraiberg v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. Wellington v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API