Legal Opinion

Bossley v. Dallas County Mental Health & Mental Retardation

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided October 9, 1996No. 05-91-00284-CVPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMAS, Chief Justice.

This appeal presents another opportunity for the courts to struggle with determining what constitutes a condition or use of tangible property as those terms are used in the Texas Tort Claims Act (the Act). See Tex. Cxv.PRAC. & Rem.Code Ann. § 101.021 (Vernon 1986). The case presents the same dilemma expressed nineteen years ago by Chief Justice Greenhill when he said, “Our problem is trying to determine what the Legislature meant.” Lowe v. Texas Tech Univ., 540 S.W.2d 297, 303 (Tex.1976) (Greenhill, C.J., concurring). Although the question of what constitutes the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Travis v. City of MesquiteTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Lowe v. Texas Tech UniversityTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  4. University of Texas Medical Branch v. YorkTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Kassen v. HatleyTexas Supreme Court · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dallas Cty. Mental Health and Mental Retardation v. BossleyTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. City of Midland v. Sullivan, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2000
  3. San Antonio State Hospital v. Koehler, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  4. University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston v. Estate of Blackmon Ex Rel. Shultz, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
  5. Gross v. Innes, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API