Legal Opinion

Gross v. Innes

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided October 11, 1996No. 05-96-00019-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KINKEADE, Justice.

This is an interlocutory appeal of an order denying Dennis Gross and Sam Moore’s motion for summary judgment that was based, in part, on official immunity. Because the summary judgment evidence did not show that Gross and Moore acted with governmental discretion or that governmental factors colored their discretion, we affirm the trial court’s order denying summary judgment.

BACKGROUND

Dennis Gross and Sam Moore are firefighter/paramedics working for the City of Farmers Branch. On September 11, 1994, they responded to a 911 emergency call for George James Innes, Jr.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Lancaster v. ChambersTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Kassen v. HatleyTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. DeWitt v. Harris CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. International Union United Automobile Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers Local 119 v. Johnson Controls, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
  5. City of Irving v. Pak, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vela v. Rocha, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
  2. Smith v. Davis, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1999
  3. Gross v. InnesTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Carrola v. Guillen, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  5. Urban v. Canada, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API