Legal Opinion

In re Goldstein

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 14, 1930No. 399PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

The bankrupt’s petition to review the referee’s turnover order of July 26, 1929, was filed with the referee on February 20, 1930. This appeal presents the question whether the petition for review was timely within Bankruptcy Rule 23 of the District Court, and this in turn depends upon whether service of a copy of the order, on July 30, 1929, upon Louis H. Solomon, was service upon the bankrupt’s attorney within the meaning of said rule.1

*699It appears that, upon the filing of an involuntary petition in bankruptcy in November, 1928, an attorney named Louis Karasik filed a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Golden Gate Consolidated Hydraulic Mining Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  2. International Agr. Corp. v. CaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
  3. Crim v. WoodfordCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1905
  4. Gill v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Withers v. LittleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Union Asphalt & Roadoils, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1968
  2. Barry v. Ashley Anderson, P.C.District Court, D. Colorado · 1989
  3. Saltzman v. Montana Department of TransportationMontana Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API