Withers v. Little
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, in the Twentieth District Court, County of Monterey. Belden, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Thornton, J.:
The plaintiff instituted this action for the foreclosure of a mortgage alleged to have been executed to him by Milton Little and Mary, his wife. The complaint is in the usual form. The mortgagors above mentioned, and David Jacks, were made de*371fondants. The mortgage to plaintiff was executed on the 11th day of December, 1875, to secure a promissory note bearing date and executed on that day, due twelve months after date, and payable to the plaintiff or order. This mortgage is alleged to have been recorded in the proper office, on the 16th of December, 1875. Little and wife suffered…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Davis v. RudolphCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Niles v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Valley Lumber Co. v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Starkweather v. EddyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Carrara v. CarraraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.