Legal Opinion
Asselta v. 149 Madison Avenue Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 31, 1945PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BONDY, District Judge.
This action was brought by maintenance employees in a building owned by the defendant, 149 Madison Avenue Corp., and operated by the defendant, Williams & Co., Inc., to recover unpaid overtime compensation, liquidated damages and a reasonable attorney’s fee pursuant to Secs. 7 and 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 207, 216(b).
The building consists of a basement and 12 floors, each covering 7,700 square feet. Of the basement, only 3,850 square feet are rentable. The total rentable area of the building is 96,250 square feet.
Maintenance employees…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Walling v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- 149 Madison Avenue Corp. v. AsseltaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- George P. Shultz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. E. E. Falk, Individually and as a Partner in Drucker and FalkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- Kemp v. Day & Zimmerman, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1948
- Shultz v. Arnheim & Neely, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
- Sicolo v. Prudential Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.