Legal Opinion

(PC) O'Brien v. Garza

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 6, 2025No. 2:22-cv-01730Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KORY T. O’BRIEN Case No. 2:22-cv-1730-TLN-JDP (P) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 R. GARZA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff has three motions pending: a motion to modify the scheduling order, ECF No. 44; 19 a motion to subpoena non-party documents, ECF No. 45, and a motion to compel, ECF No. 46. 20 Defendants have opposed the motion to compel. ECF No. 47. I will grant plaintiff’s motions to 21 modify the scheduling order and to subpoena non-party documents and deny his motion to 22 compel. 23…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Kelly v. City of San JoseDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987
  4. In Re Grand Jury Investigation. United States of America v. The Corporation 1Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. RuehleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API