Legal Opinion
M.R. v. B.C.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 21, 2019No. Court of Appeals Case No. 18A-PO-2156PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Section 2 - Any error in the admission of evidence was harmless.
[13] M.R. maintains that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting certain hearsay evidence during the hearing.1 Specifically, he argues that, over his objections, the trial court improperly allowed B.C. to testify regarding statements made by L.M. about how L.M. felt about M.R.2 Our standard of review of a trial court's admission of evidence is an abuse of discretion.
*225In re Des.B. , 2 N.E.3d 828, 834 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014). An abuse of discretion occurs if the trial court's decision is clearly against the logic and effect…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Barger v. BargerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Matusky v. Sheffield Square ApartmentsIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Michael E. Hitchens v. Collection Specialists, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014
3Cited by5 opinions
- A.S. and J.S. v. D.C. (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
- Earl J. Fizer, Andrew Heater, and Jeffrey Kirby, each in his capacity as Board Member of Jefferson Knolls Homeowners Association, an unincorporated association v. Deana Pierson (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
- M&S Steel Corp. v. Wendell H. Kemplen (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020
- N B v. L BIndiana Court of Appeals · 2025
- Ryan Matthew Hart v. R.D. (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019