Michael E. Hitchens v. Collection Specialists, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PYLE, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Michael E. Hitchens (“Hitchens”) appeals the small claims court’s judgment in favor of Collection Specialists, Inc. (“Collection Specialists”) concerning a bill for dental work.
We affirm.
ISSUE
Whether the small claims court denied Hitchens the due process of law when it admitted a letter containing hearsay into evidence.
FACTS
On July 19, 2010, Hitchens visited his periodontist, Doctor VanDorn (“Dr. Van-Dorn”), for a routine examination of his gums. While there, Hitchens mentioned that he had noticed that some of his teeth — numbers 5, 6, 7, and 8 — were…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Trinity Homes, LLC v. FangIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Morton v. IvacicIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Turner v. Board of Aviation CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Indiana State Board of Education v. Brownsburg Community School Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Matusky v. Sheffield Square ApartmentsIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- M.R. v. B.C.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
- M.R. v. B.C. (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019