United States v. BECTON DICKINSON & COMPANY
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
WORTENDYKE, District Judge.
In the course of several pretrial discovery motions in this Government civil antitrust case, the Court is presently called upon to rule upon plaintiff’s motion, made pursuant to Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for an order requiring the defendant to produce and permit plaintiff’s inspection and copying of 118 specific documents listed in the notice of motion. In his affidavit in support of the motion, the attorney for the Government characterizes the documents, for the production of which the motion is brought, as consisting generally of “writings…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- Independent Productions Corp. v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Georgia-Pacific Plywood Co. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Radiant Burners, Inc. v. American Gas AssociationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1962
- Radiant Burners, Inc. v. American Gas AssociationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Boyd v. GullettDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1974
- Baylor v. Mading-Dugan Drug Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
- Sicpa North America v. Donaldson EnterprisesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Ortiz v. H. L. H. Products Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1965
- Lukee Enterprises, Inc. v. New York Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1971