Legal Opinion
Mijatovic v. Noonan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 29, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), dated June 27, 1989, as denied that branch of his motion which was to strike the plaintiffs’ complaint and cancel the notice of pendency filed by the plaintiffs for failure to respond to certain discovery demands.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Supreme Court properly refused to compel the plaintiffs to respond to interrogatories numbered 3, 4, 5…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jewell v. RoweAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Metzger v. BrockmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Brandon v. ChefetzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Lilling v. Syracuse Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Fellner v. Texas Mexican Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Latture v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Deer Park Associates v. Town of BabylonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Schobel v. GodwinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Spencer v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002