United States v. Jorge Luis Esquivel-Ortega
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge.
Jorge Luis Esquivel-Ortega (“Esquiv-el”) challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his convictions for conspiracy to distribute cocaine and heroin, and possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846. We conclude that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the convictions and therefore reverse. 1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
BACKGROUND
From late 2001 to the end of 2002, agents of the federal Drug Enforcement Agency (“DEA”) based in Seattle, Washington, were investigating a drug conspiracy.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. Pascual Dionicio JeronimoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Ramon Hernandez-Guardado,defendant-Appellant. United States of America v. Dario Jimenez-FriasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Sylvia Vasquez-Chan, United States of America v. Julia Gaxiola-CastilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. James Daychild, United States of America v. Patrick O. NeissCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. John Wayne Pennington and John Mitchell MargiottaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. PelisamenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. TranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Kenneth KyleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Anthony BoykinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. NevilsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.