Legal Opinion

Ex parte Shay

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 14, 2016No. WR-84,007-01PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · KeaslerKeasler, J.

in which Johnson, Hervey, Alcala, Richardson, and Newell, JJ., joined.

Does estoppel bar an applicant from seeking habeas corpus relief for a conviction based on a statute subsequently declared facially unconstitutional? We hold that it does not. We accordingly set aside Patrick Shay’s conviction and remand the cause to the trial court to dismiss the indictment.

I

Pursuant to a plea bargain, Shay was convicted of improper photography or visual recording in violation of Texas Penal Code § 21.15(b)(1) and sentenced to two years’ confinement, the maximum confinement permitted for the…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HarringtonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  2. Rhodes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  3. Ex Parte RenierCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Reyes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Chance, Donald RayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ex parte BeckCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
  2. Ex parte MitchamCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
  3. Horton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
  4. Bryan Wayne Whillhite v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2021
  5. Ex Parte George Trotti v. ., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API