Legal Opinion

Ex parte Mitcham

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 14, 2018No. WR-87,738-01PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young , 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to online solicitation of a minor and, after a period of deferred adjudication, was sentenced to three years' imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

This Court, in Ex parte Lo , held unconstitutional the online solicitation of a minor statute for which Applicant was convicted. Ex parte Lo , 424 S.W.3d 10 (Tex. Crim.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Ex Parte YoungCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. United States v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ex parte BenedictCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2019
  2. Ex parte CrawfordCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2019
  3. Gonzalez, Jose DCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2022
  4. In RE COLTON LESTER v. the State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Stephen Elliot Powers v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API