United States v. One Hundred Thirty-Three (133) United States Postal Service Money Orders
District Court, D. Hawaii
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR STRIKE AND FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT *
J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is an action brought under the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 (“CAFRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 983, against 133 United States Postal Service (“USPS”) money orders valued at $127,479.24 (the “Defendant Money Orders”). The Defendant Money Orders were seized in rem by Plaintiff United States (“Plaintiff’ or “the Government”) under 31 U.S.C. § 5317(c)(2). Plaintiff now moves under Rule G(8)(c) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.