Legal Opinion
Gulati v. Zuckerman
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 25, 1989No. Civ. A. 89-4618PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CAHN, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in this defamation action are Jack Gulati, a citizen of Pennsylvania, and Fidelity Technologies Corporation (FTC), a Pennsylvania corporation of which Gulati is president. The defendants are Viatek, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation; Lawrence H. Zuckerman, Viatek’s president; Gregory S. Baumann and Harry J. Diamond, employees of Viatek; and Barry P. Yeakel, a former employee of Viatek. The individual defendants are all citizens of Pennsylvania.
This action was originally filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County. The case was removed to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Mesa v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Spalding v. VilasSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Ryan v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1992
- Alsup v. 3-Day Blinds, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2006
- Fung v. Abex Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1992
- James Murray and Ruth Gould v. Northrop Grumman Information Technology, Inc., Docket No. 04-5097-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Arness v. Boeing North American, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1998
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.