United States v. Vonkageler

We have examined the record of trial, the assignments of error, and the Govern-*643merit’s reply thereto and have concluded that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the accused was committed. We reject the accused’s contention that denial of speedy review warrants dismissal of the Charge. The offenses of which the accused stands convicted, including sale of marijuana, are serious and, therefore, are not the type that must be dismissed for lack of speedy review. United States v. Clevidence, 14 M.J. 17…