Legal Opinion

United States v. Flint

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided June 4, 1976No. 30,915PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLETCHER, Chief Judge:

The decision of the United States Army Court of Military Review is affirmed. In affirming, we adopt the development and analysis of that court in resolving the speedy trial question,1 except insofar as the court exempted all rehearings, rather than merely Dubay-type proceedings2 from the *429Burton3 rule. A DuBay proceeding, in effect, is utilized to gather additional evidence or to resolve conflicting evidence before determining an issue presented to the appellate tribunal. A rehearing, on the other hand, is a trial de novo, to redetermine either an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  2. United States v. BurtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Loving v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  2. United States v. KelkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  3. Hollywood v. YostU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1985
  4. United States v. MartinU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978
  5. United States v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API