Shadoan v. Barnett
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Chief Justice Thomas—
Affirming.
The appellants and plaintiffs below, five in number, styling themselves as residents and citizens of Pulaski county and conceiving that the unrepealed portions of chapter 10, page 25, Acts 1906, and chapter 112, Acts 1918, as amended by chapter 157 Acts 1920, all composing our present statutory law commonly known as the “Bog Law” were each and all ijnconstitutional and invalid, brought this action on behalf of themselves and other citizens similarly situated against the tax commissioner and other officers possessing imposed duties in the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Mountain Timber Company v. State of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Sentell v. New Orleans & Carrollton R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Blair v. ForehandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Lakes v. GoodloeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- State ex. rel. Curtis v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hearn v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
- Second Street Properties, Inc. v. Fiscal Court of Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
- Blue Coach Lines, Inc. v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Ammon v. WeltyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2002
- Bond v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.