Legal Opinion

Hearn v. City of Overland Park

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 14, 1989No. 62,045PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allegrucci, J.:

The plaintiffs seek to enjoin the City of Overland Park from enforcing an ordinance regulating the ownership of pit bulls within the city. The plaintiffs are thirteen residents of Johnson County, Kansas, who own dogs kept within the City of Overland Park, Kansas. In their petition filed with the district court, the plaintiffs contended that the ordinance was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad, and violated their rights to due process and equal protection of the laws. The petition also included a claim for damages pursuant to 42…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Weigel v. MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
  3. Boatright v. Kansas Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  4. Greenwood v. City of North Salt LakeUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Matthews v. Amberwood Associates Ltd. Partnership, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API