Legal Opinion
Betts v. USAA Gen. Indem. Co.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Decided May 1, 2019No. CV-18-776PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtBrandon J. Harrison, Judge
In May 2016, Earl Betts and Amy Betts bought a new 2016 Jeep Wrangler from a dealership in Springdale, Arkansas. When they did so they signed a retail-installment sales contract that gave Ally Financial a secured interest in the jeep in exchange for lending them $ 39,137.26. The Bettses insured the jeep through a policy with USAA General Indemnity Company (USAA). They also bought additional coverage for it through a guaranteed asset-protection (GAP) contract with the dealership.
*480Not long after they had bought the jeep, the Bettses were involved in a collision that totaled the jeep. USAA paid…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bayird v. FloydSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- Kowalski v. Rose Drugs of Dardanelle, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- Speights v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Murry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Fisher v. Citizens BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Earl Betts and Amy Betts v. Usaa General Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020